The formula
Percent error = (|measured − actual| ÷ actual) × 100
It expresses how far an experimental result sits from the accepted or true value, as a proportion of that true value.
The denominator is the actual value, not the measured one. The absolute value bars mean the result is normally reported as a positive figure regardless of direction.
Worked example
Measuring the density of aluminium as 2.60 g/cm³ against an accepted 2.70:
(|2.60 − 2.70| ÷ 2.70) × 100 = (0.10 ÷ 2.70) × 100 = 3.7%
Accuracy versus precision
These are distinct, and percent error only measures one of them.
- Accuracy — how close a measurement is to the true value. This is what percent error captures.
- Precision — how closely repeated measurements agree with each other.
A badly calibrated instrument can be highly precise and badly inaccurate: five readings clustered tightly together, all wrong by the same amount. Precision alone is no evidence of correctness.
Interpreting the result
What counts as acceptable depends entirely on context. A school experiment within 5% is usually fine. Analytical chemistry or engineering tolerances may require a fraction of a percent.
Sources of error
- Systematic error — consistent bias from miscalibration or flawed method. Shifts every reading the same way and will not average out with repetition.
- Random error — unpredictable variation from reading limits and environmental fluctuation. Reduced by averaging repeated trials.
Repeating a measurement helps with random error and does nothing for systematic error — which is why a consistently wrong result points to method or equipment rather than carelessness.